Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Foran

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete (3d, 1 weak keep). Mindmatrix 15:57, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Max Foran

Obscure, orphan and possibly vanity Mecanismo 22:46, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete, submitter --Mecanismo 22:48, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
    • There really wasn't any need for you to vote there. Everyone can see you nominated. Speaking of which, a little more evidence on why you think this bloke is non-notable wouldn't go astray. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 15:11, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Note: relisted 13 December 2005. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 15:11, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

  • Weak keep but expand. I actually have interviewed this person for newspapers. The article doesn't address the fact he is a well-published author of academic works. This is a very weak keep, but I contend he's notable enough in academia to justify being kept. 23skidoo 17:00, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Set a time limit to expand - if the assertion of notability is that he the principal of a Canadian school, I doubt that would be sufficient, but if his noteworthiness comes from his publications, then there's a worthwhile possibility of sufficient notability. B.Wind 21:29, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete --- Nothing notable, except that he was nominated for some award (but did not win). He was named as "one of" the University's best professors one year, but how many people made that list? 209.202.119.248 15:02, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete unless something notable is documented about him. --GrantNeufeld 00:54, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.