Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mauro Brandão Lopes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Majorly (hot!) 16:20, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mauro Brandão Lopes

Mauro Brandão Lopes (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Sergio Pinheiro Lopes's follow-up (AfD here). Fails WP:BIO. Húsönd 22:02, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 08:11, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Copyvio from Answers.com --sumnjim talk with me·changes 14:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Look at the bottom of the Answers.com entry, where it says: "This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia". Answers.com copies us, not the other way around. Punkmorten 21:14, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
My bad... --sumnjim talk with me·changes 23:35, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep Full professors who have written several books are generally notable. Weak because this has not yet been sourced--including the books.DGG 00:04, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- Pete.Hurd 01:14, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment Maybe it might be better suited in the Spanish Wiki? When I google this person, it seems as though most if not all articles on this person are in spanish. Just a thought. I searched spanish wiki and no article exists as of yet on this person. --sumnjim talk with me·changes 16:26, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
  • delete I see no notability claim in the article, and I don't think there is one to be made. Pete.Hurd 20:58, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. I couldn't find sources to support the claims in the article. Sancho (Review me) 07:27, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.