Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maureen Johnson (Rent)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP w/ strong recommendation to merge, or redirect. - Nabla 15:23, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Maureen Johnson (Rent)

Maureen Johnson (Rent) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article is ridiculous. It has no cited sources, it's redundant and it looks like a teenage girl wrote it. There isn't a reason in the world it should still be standing. BaronessofBud 14:50, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

• Merge into one article at List of Rent characters and clean up as necessary. ~Matticus ^T_C 15:17, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
• Merge this and the other two Rent-related articles into List of Rent characters, per Matticus. Also, be aware WP:IDONTLIKEIT isn't a valid reason for deletion.--Sethacus 15:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
• Merge. Ditto. James Luftan ^contribs 16:10, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
• Merge As above. The character has established notability by the fact that the play is notable. Shoessss |  Chat 
• Merge Per above. ---The Bethling^(Talk) 01:49, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to Rent (musical). On its own, this is not notable enough a subject for a stand-alone article. Combined with the other characters, there's not much to be said that isn't already in the article for the musical. Merging a bad idea as it will reiterate the main article. —  MusicMaker5376 16:01, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.