Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew McMullen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Owen× ☎ 17:35, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Matthew McMullen

• Non-notable. Rmhermen 15:57, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity. BrianSmithson 20:18, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Dlyons493 Talk 20:57, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Latinus 21:53, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
• comment it would be useful if we could be a little more explicite than "Non-notable". Why is he non notable? Can anything be done to the article to make it more notable? etc... Jcuk 00:01, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable vanity biography. He's just not important. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-24 05:15Z
• Delete. Non-notable in this case tends to refer to someone who does not meet the criteria at WP:BIO. However I do strongly encourage people to come up with better reasons for deletion. Stifle 12:34, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete under my Proquest/Newsbank test. More was written about the 20 year old carrier of the Olympic torch in California. Calwatch 04:13, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.