Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew LeDrew

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:30, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Matthew LeDrew

Matthew LeDrew (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

SF / horror author of questioned notability; brought here as contested speedy, but also to discuss together with his books, listed below. Tikiwont (talk) 13:06, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Black Womb (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Transformations in Pain (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

• Delete all. No evidence that the author or his books have attracted any attention in the form of reviews or mentions in secondary sources. The books are essentially self-published (Engen Books is owned by Matthew LeDrew and has published nothing other than LeDrew's two books). The bio article is, I think, suitable for an A7 speedy, but there's unfortunately no speedy criterion for books. Deor (talk) 14:23, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
• I note that the books aren't even available on Amazon (either US or CA). It takes work to verify with a source independent of the self-publisher that they even exist, let alone that they're notable. (And not, it's not unfortunate that there's no speedy criterion for books -- five days is fast enough, and gives editors who don't check wikipedia every single day a chance to find notability evidence.) Delete all until such time as the books get significant reviews. —Quasirandom (talk) 15:18, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete all until such time as the books get significant reviews. I submit that in my rush I may have added the Matthew LeDrew, Black Womb] and Transformations in Pain articles before they were notable and relevant. You make good points about the lack of reviews and notability of the book. I will hold off on posting these items to wikipedia until such a time that the author/books become more noteworthy. Thank you. —Thecrew2008 (talk) 29 February 2008 —Preceding comment was added at 17:31, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - the creator of these pages has also created many other pages which all relate in some way to Iceberg Publishing - a self publisher?. Taking one of these at random as an example - The Almost Coup - no attempt is made at establishing notability, and google shows only 82 results, the first of which is the wikipedia entry. I suspect therefore that User:Thecrew2008 has a COI with Iceberg Publishing as these books seem unknown otherwise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.210.172 (talk) 17:46, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Kenneth Tam is basically self published as the Iceberg publishing website describes him as 'A founding partner in Iceberg Publishing' - ie. he publishes his own books, The only claim to notability on his wikipedia page is winning an award in high school, which I don't think passes WP:BIO. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.210.172 (talk) 17:52, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.