Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Gold

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lack of WP:V. Pigman☿ 05:12, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Matthew Gold

Matthew Gold (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Contested CSD; it was tagged for notability concerns. Brought here for further consensus. Keilana(recall) 04:09, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete. Does not seem notable per my research. Sensiblekid (talk) 04:57, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Let's see how this goes before deleting it. —BoL 05:21, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep I think that there are many articles with the same format and notability on wikipedia, and this article supports those in a more current state, i.e. Jewish Defense League and Shelley Rubin. This article is necessary if the section for Kahanism is to stay at all relevant and current. This article must be an example to see how we should best update the Kahanist section with today's more influential Kahanists. AniChai (talk) 05:48, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Doesn't appear notable, no notable references (mainstream media, news outlets?) on the article. And WP:OTHERSTUFF isn't a reason to keep an article. alex.muller (talk) 11:55, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, non-notable activist, no independent sources indicating that he's particularly notable as far as Kahanists go. Lankiveil (talk) 13:08, 29 December 2007 (UTC).
  • Delete per above. I don't see any encyclopedic notability here. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:37, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak delete unless there are some actual third party references referring to him particularly as having done something notable individually. DGG (talk) 17:53, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Just because the media does not know about someone does not mean they do not do important things. 71.57.186.45 (talk) 19:49, 29 December 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.