Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew D. Martin III

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-04-26 07:18Z

[edit] Matthew D. Martin III

Matthew D. Martin III (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No references provided to back up the claims made in the article, and insufficient evidence of notability. I can see that an essay has been written by an individual named Matthew Martin, but there is no evidence of its importance.Strangerer (Talk) 01:14, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Otebig 01:41, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. If this essay is so brilliant, why isn't anyone talking about it, and specifically who called it brilliant? It could have been a notable individual, but it could also have as easily been his mother. There's no evidence and no attribution, and from the Google search I just did it doesn't appear to be attributable. --Charlene 01:59, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. -steventity 02:50, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. There isn't even an indication of where his articles were published. I suspect that the author of this article has a conflict of interest. --Metropolitan90 03:35, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete no refs and weasely. the_undertow talk 03:38, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. dcandeto 04:03, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Userify and delete and ask for references before recreation. "His most recent article ..." - published where? Nevermind, I've copied to his user space, (Martin article copied to a subpage) asking him to work on it Shenme 04:34, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.