Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Kroll

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Also, a number of other pages link to Matt Kroll in different contexts (as a CEO and as a scientist), so probably different people. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-02 08:33Z

[edit] Matt Kroll

Matt Kroll (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

It does not really assert notability, and doesn't cite sources. --Hojimachong^talk 02:53, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete under WP:V, no sources + no references + living person = no choice Alf photoman 17:27, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - as above, vanity --JBellis 19:09, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and maybe even Speedy under criterion A7? It doesn't assert any notability, and even calls their music "a complete bomb". Leebo⁸⁶ 23:31, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I agree with Leebo86 that this is a possible speedy, given that there are no obvious claims of notability. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 05:03, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.