Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matsui 1409T
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy deletion. --Ed (Edgar181) 16:41, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Matsui 1409T
- I can't seem to find any google hits for this and the article and it seems to be written as a joke Purgatory Fubar Converse or Snafu 19:41, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Strong support - we can't be having articles for every model of anything or we'd be here forever especially as this one seems to be a joke of some form. --Samtheboy (t/c) 20:26, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - the Matsui 1409T is a real television and I have the pictures to prove it. Gordo of the Press Club 21:55, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Article creator would appear to have mistaken Wikipedia for Uncyclopedia. DarkSaber2k 21:58, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
-
- Comment - the above user doesn't like me for some reason. Gordo of the Press Club 22:07, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- That's why I'm commenting on the article and not you. Comment on content, not editors. DarkSaber2k 22:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - the above user doesn't like me for some reason. Gordo of the Press Club 22:07, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - the article is a joke not an encylopedia entry, however if a TV model did sell over 100,000,000 items then it does deserve an article, however in this case the figure is probably inflated. GB 03:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Strong comment - Surely the fact that this doesn't appear on the AfD index renders it invalid... Gordo of the Press Club 08:19, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
-
- Even stronger comment - I note it's appeared on there now. But it's yesterday's page. Those who may have wished to comment won't be checking yesterday's AfD page. May I suggest it be relisted afresh in the proper manner? Gordo of the Press Club 10:13, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- If you bothered to read about what you're trying to criticise you'd know that AfDs are always listed on the day they are STARTED. It has been listed in the proper manner. DarkSaber2k 10:15, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Even stronger comment - I note it's appeared on there now. But it's yesterday's page. Those who may have wished to comment won't be checking yesterday's AfD page. May I suggest it be relisted afresh in the proper manner? Gordo of the Press Club 10:13, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
