Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matsudaira Teruko

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no consensus, so keep. Deathphoenix 01:59, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Matsudaira Teruko

Wikipedia is not a genealogy database. Radiant! 10:08, Mar 2, 2005 (UTC)

  • Indeed. Delete. Mgm|(talk) 10:54, Mar 2, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. This article was not a genealogy database entry. I reorganized and added to it. Fg2 13:35, Mar 2, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, preferably, failing that merge with a daimyo or somewhere. Kappa 14:32, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Definitely notable in Japanese history. HyperZonktalk 17:50, Mar 2, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Notable historical figure. — Gwalla | Talk 21:11, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Does not meet basic deletion criteria.--Gene_poole 22:56, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, geneology, a lot of Google hits are referring/linking back to the Wikipedia article. Megan1967 23:48, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Notable, encyclopedic, historical. Need I say more? Beautiful save, BTW. - Lucky 6.9 02:11, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: She had a notable father, a notable father by adoption, a notable brother by adoption, and a notable husband, and lived through some notable events. The article doesn't say what she did that's encyclopedic. There's also no article in ja:, for what that's worth. No vote yet. —Korath (Talk) 10:17, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)
    • Changing to delete, based on Atsi Otani's agreement below. I wouldn't object to some of this content being moved elsewhere, however. —Korath (Talk) 11:53, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: I added some info to the original article (as 202.232.46.213 - I forgot to login), but I have to agree with Korath - I can't figure out what she did that's encyclopedic. The Aizu Joshitai, which is mentioned in the article, seemed much more significant to me. Atsi Otani 06:14, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Non-notable figure who was just related to notable people. RickK 06:16, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)
    • Concur with Korath and Rick; being related to a notable person does not make you notable yourself. Delete stands. Radiant! 10:11, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.