Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matilda Lisanti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 03:06, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Matilda Lisanti

No cites does not read like a Wiki article at all. Cheers, JetLover ^(talk) 00:28, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

• Weak keep, turns up a few reliable Google hits for reports of her death. I would think that if several sources reported on just her death, then maybe she's notable for something. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 00:33, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Delete she may be notable for something but there are no sources. Oysterguitarist 00:40, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. It reads like nothing more than a family history. We've recently had a huge problem with people coming to Wikipedia to post their family-history summaries. An article that is of interest only to one family has not established notability for its subject. Qworty 00:52, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
• Weak delete; reads like a family history; the article states she helped create Lisanti Foods. Googling this establishment yields not enough results to easily justify having an article on it's (co?)creator. Iotha 01:24, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Looks like Lisanti Foods's greatest claim to fame was being one of the largest suppliers of Sbarro's, and "one of the largest" Italian food suppliers. Too little information from WP:RS for a reasonable article on the company let alone the founder. --Dhartung | Talk 02:55, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:ATT and WP:NOTE. This is basically an obituary, lacks sourcing, and even makes the case itself that the company is not notable. EyeSerene^TALK 19:41, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, Wikipedia is not an bituary. And if Lisanti Foods doesn't have an article, that implies that her notability level is not article-worthy. --RandomOrca2 03:47, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, fails the everything test. RFerreira 01:34, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.