Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mathew Beard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh 00:50, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mathew Beard

Mathew Beard (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Wholly unreferenced stub article on someone claimed to be the oldest man ever born in the USA, which is not a bad assertion of notability … but even if there wre some references to support that assertion, there would also need to be some substantial coverage in reliable sources for him to be notable per WP:BIO. I have searched for refs, but didn't expect to find much since he died in 1985: see Google books search, google news search 1, google news search 2 - the search is complicated by the two possible spellings of Matthew/Mathew and the presence of many other Mat(t)hew Beards, though Gnews did throw up two subscription-only hits in old local newspapers which may or may be relevant, but which in either case do not seem substantial.[1][2]
Meanwhile the article consists almost entirely of unsourced speculation about Beard's place in the longevity rankings. He is listed in List of the oldest people#List and in Oldest people#Oldest_men_ever_.28top_10.29, which is quite sufficient unless and until there is something substantive to write about him from reliable sources. There may be printed sources which are not available online, and if they are found then the article could of course be recreated at a later date if substantial coverage is found in reliable sources. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:35, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Comment And then his case is questionable. Might not be 114. Neal (talk) 18:05, 15 December 2007 (UTC).

  • Delete per everything after its first "paragraph." --Thinboy00 @962, i.e. 22:05, 15 December 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.