Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Materialisations

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Redirect to materialization. Fernando Rizo T/C 00:03, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Materialisations

Unverified, and unverifiable junk. Not quite patent nonsense in the wikipedia sense, but there is no way this can be converted to an encyclopedic article that I can see. Delate! DES ^(talk)

• Article has been marked with speedy tag, but if votes are still needed Delete. -- WCFrancis 03:53, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
• This has come up before, at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Materialization (science fiction). Plural→singular Redirect to materialization. Uncle G 05:16:45, 2005-08-19 (UTC)
• Redirect. per Uncle G. Alf 10:59, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Unverified pseudoscience, original research at the best stretch. (I put up the Speedy tag on the original unadorned page, but after seeing this have replaced it with VfD.) MCB 07:13, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect as Uncle G. Perfect. --Tony Sidaway^Talk 22:37, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.