Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MatchDoctor

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 00:16, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] MatchDoctor

Delete as advertising. The author has been spamming related pages with external links to this and affiliated sites. Joyous 17:32, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)

Note that the article is now mirrored at MatchDoctor.com Joyous 18:19, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete -- business / web site vanity - Longhair | Talk 17:34, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Ad spam. DS1953 17:45, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Undelete Was unaware this was not accepted
• Undelete Check out Adult FriendFinder
• Strong delete. Advertising and the last two comments are just more of the same. jglc | t | c 18:31, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete (although I think the reference to Adult FriendFinder was just meant as an example of a similar entity that does merit an article. This one doesn't. Not notable. -- BD2412 ^talk 19:31, 2005 Jun 8 (UTC)
  • Fair enough; but why is that user voting undelete, then? jglc | t | c 20:19, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• My guess would be that "undelete" = "keep," and that the anon user doesn't realize that anon/new user votes are discounted. Joyous 23:16, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete (empty now) and the MatchDoctor.com too (ad). Pavel Vozenilek 19:52, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Delete. Random internet hookup sites are non-notable. As vote history shows, the undelete votes were placed by 66.176.76.58. Look at this person'scontribution history. Undelete votes should not count if the user doesn't post ID. (~ ~ ~ ~) MPS 22:10, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment What do you all think about the other contributions by this user? jglc | t | c 15:21, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • I think this user contribution history demonstrates that intent is to promote non-notable dating sites. Check out all the diffs. MPS 16:00, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy del Business adverisement, non-notable. Also consideration of link spam on several articles. <>Who?¿? 19:32, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment. I would appeal to whoever it is that cleans up this entry to also take a look at this user's other entries. jglc | t | c 20:04, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.