Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mastery International School Bangalore

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. — Scientizzle 15:49, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mastery International School Bangalore

Mastery International School Bangalore (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Tiny school that does not establish notability. Went with AfD over speedy all the same, though. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 01:25, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete - Article doesn't assert notability and it comprises almost solely of an info box. Delete. Spawn Man 01:35, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. There's no "there" there. No context at all. Realkyhick 03:28, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete not an article. Not even a stub. Not even a substub. Heck, not even a single-sentence subsubstub. This probably could have been speedied as no content/no context. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:55, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. The article now has more content but the school only opened in August 2007. Consequently no reliable independent sources will be available to compile an encyclopaedic article. The article is nothing more than an advertisement for the school. Dahliarose 11:15, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 06:57, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 06:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - The article has improved considerably since the first three editors on this page saw it. The author appears to be continuing to work on it. True, it is a new school but if it is important addition to the area (as it sounds like it is), I think that the school is "worthy of note" and the article should be retained. -- DS1953 talk 03:59, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
There still aren't any sources for it, and as Keb25 said, it reads exactly like an advertisement. GlassCobra 22:42, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Non-notable school, advertising article. Keb25 22:38, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete There's a reason why the text of this article sounds like an advertisement: It's taken directly and without quotations from various spots on the school's Web site. I suspect every word here is a copyright violation, just as the single picture in the gallery is owned by the school. I see no useful purpose to this article (since it all can be found on the school's Web site) and I see no reason to think it will ever be improved. Noroton 03:01, 18 September 2007 (UTC) ((add words in parentheses Noroton 03:03, 18 September 2007 (UTC)))


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.