Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Master Tatu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by Mailer diablo as WP:CSD G11. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 17:46, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Master Tatu

Master Tatu (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Self-written biography - no assertion of notability and unsourced. Robotman¹⁹⁷⁴ 13:49, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Spam. -- RHaworth 14:17, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Per WP:V and WP:SPAM and definitely failing WP:NN.Tellyaddict 14:37, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
• Userfy back to where it was before the creator promoted it to article space [1]. It's difficult: Googling suggests he may well be notable within his field of interest, but it being so specialised (and taboo to the mainstream) means it's always going to be hard to find verification per WP:RS. That said, he needs a cluebat for conflict of interest: Master Tatu (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log) finds a deal of linking to his own websites, as well as signing articles, asserting copyright (check out Osada Sensei in relation to WP:NOT#MEMORIAL), etc. Tearlach 02:05, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
• delete WP:VAIN Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 05:05, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
• delete as per Tellyaddict Poeloq 08:17, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
• delete per WP:VAIN. Durova^Charge! 14:50, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
• Userfy or delete. WP:AUTO. Guy (Help!) 15:25, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.