The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Kirill Lokshin 05:01, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Neologism - under 600 Google hits and only 157 unique hits. Purported buzzword has no evidence of use beyond a few PR and ad agencies trying to sound trendy. FCYTravis 20:20, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete. After further reading, I agree that this is a neologism used exclusively by readers of trendwatching.com. Gazpacho 20:51, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.