Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maryse Casol2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:32, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Maryse Casol

AfDs for this article:
Articles for deletion/Maryse Casol Articles for deletion/Maryse Casol2
Maryse Casol (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This was deleted via AFD last year (see here). Though this version attempts to provide some sources, I'm still not convinced that this artist meets artist notability guidelines. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:58, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete because (a) evidence for notability is very weak and (b) this is a poorly-translated article overflowing with inappropriately florid language. No prejudice against a proper article, since it's the article that is the issue here, per the care required to ensure good sourcing as expressed in WP:BLP, as much as the notability of the subject. The article as written is borderline spam. Actually not very borderline, at that. Cruftbane 22:20, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete fails WP:BIO and WP:N. No news archives mentioning this artist, and most G-hits are her wordpress blog, her blip.tv, her youtube.com, her (insert web self-upload tool here)... --Sc straker 13:52, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. —David Eppstein 16:38, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and Sc straker. A nice touch though with "museum-like solo exhibition." It's almost in a museum because it's "museum-like." Gives me some ideas. Freshacconci | Talk 17:01, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Modernist 02:09, 20 October 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.