Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maryland Home Improvement Contractors

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per G11 and rapidly growing consensus here. --Coredesat 05:27, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Maryland Home Improvement Contractors

Maryland Home Improvement Contractors (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Contested PROD. This "article" is completely made of original research (which isn't even following NPOV) and it contains no encyclopedic value. Rjd0060 01:33, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Comment: I don't think I would call it "blatant advertising". - Rjd0060 01:42, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete- It's Crap. I would almost consider it spam my self!! Yourname 01:38, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
  • delete it - badly written, no sources, no notability. seems to be self promotion. --Neon white 01:39, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. As I originally prodded the article, I believe that the article has no place on the wiki. Unfortunately, no speedy deletion criteria applies here.--Michael Greiner 01:43, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete: Reads like a brochure. Jermor 01:48, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete: Riddiculous, not even entertaining. I think that spam is the pertect word for it. Jfv93 10:00, 22 October 2007 (EST)
  • Delete: per nom, non notable, reads like an advertisement and is badly written, full of original research. Kevin 02:12, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete: Disagree that no speedy delete applies: "Blatant examples of advertising masquerading as articles can be speedily deleted". The guy has added the Banner Home Solutions link to several other pages (all removed) so it is obviously his company. SilentC 04:27, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.