Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Cunningham

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge to Mary Cunningham Agee. I've tagged the appropriate articles - go nuts! Proto///type 15:01, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mary Cunningham

Article doesn't answer question 'who is this person' or 'why is this person worthy of note'. Article is confusing and lacks context. Antonrojo 03:04, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

• Merge to Mary Cunningham Agee; hopefully it can be NPOViewed on the way. Ziggurat 03:14, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per Ziggurat. She was involved in a big news story back in 1982, although I can't remember exactly what it was about, even after reading these articles. --Metropolitan90 03:17, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per Ziggurat. --Coredesat 04:23, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• strong delete this doesn't warrant an article, not notable, just becuase she may have been involved in a scandal in the 80's doesn't give here notability. Trm3 10:50, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge - scandals do create notability, but no reason to have two separate articles on one person. AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 16:39, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge as above. --Xyrael ^T 16:49, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with Mary Cunningham Agee and redirect (I recall her under the name Mary Cunningham). Noteworthy individual. Fg2 12:54, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.