Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marvin Pierce

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:02, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Marvin Pierce

Marvin Pierce (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Father of Barbara Pierce, not sufficiently independently notable.--Michael White^T·C 18:29, 10 March 2008 (UTC) --Michael White^T·C 18:29, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 19:01, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
• Strong keep As the publisher of several major magazines, he is sufficiently notable in his own right, even without his connections to political families. Caerwine Caer’s whines 19:08, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

• Comment So? There are lots of living people in similar positions who we don't and wouldn't have articles on today.--Michael White^T·C 19:18, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

• Comment See WP:WAX. --Dhartung | Talk 21:11, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

• Comment I didn't mean it that way, I meant, were we to have this debate about someone of a similar level of importance today, I don't think there would be as much debate as to their notability - disagree? Would we have an article for every publisher of several magazines who is not covered by reliable sources (or at least I can't find any, on Google)? --Michael White^T·C 21:57, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

• Comment Given when he lived, I wouldn't consider Google to be the likeliest place to find references on him. Building this article past its current stub status is likely going to take someone willing or interested in hitting the stacks in some library. We need to keep and expand this article to combat Recentism See WP:CSB. Caerwine Caer’s whines 23:34, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete conflict of wiki policy —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thright (talk • contribs)

What conflict are you alluding to? Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 19:35, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

• Keep, head of major publishing corporation during its heyday. --Dhartung | Talk 21:11, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep Publisher of McCall's is sufficient. DGG (talk) 00:02, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - I'd say he's independently notable, and surely he passes WP:V as well. -FrankTobia (talk) 04:59, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep as above, I believe notability has been firmly established here. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 19:11, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.