The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP. — JIP | Talk 11:33, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Weak keep. Either a double parricide or a miscarriage of justice. Notable either way? --Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 14:18, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Very weak keep but only if it gets cleaned up a lot. Dan 19:46, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Keep. Important case. -- JJay 21:22, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.