Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Williams

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash^talk 00:49, 17 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Martin Williams

• Delete I do not believe that these people are notable, especially Rhiannon Biddulph. The last sentence seems to be more or less an advert for their handfasting service. I would consider this a vanity article. MacRusgail 13:39, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
• I support that this is the worst kind of abuse of wikipedia, little more than an advert, and not even her real name too. - 84.69.16.92
• delete not worthy of an encyclopedia article and possibly vanity. --Mecanismo 17:58, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
• delete vanity. --Quasipalm 18:00, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
• Please delete. How sad. Next we'll be hearing about people's hobbies or pets:) I had no idea Wikipedia was a place for free advertisements or free personal webspace. - 86.137.20.35
• Delete nn vanity and possible adspam---CH (talk) 05:36, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• keep This discussion has already taken place, and as far as I can tell the very person calling for a delete is the same person who vandalised both the Martin Williams entry and the Pagan Association entry. Pettiness and spite are not seen as valid reasons to delete pages. I do agree with the handfasting comment and have removed the link to this. Rhiannon Biddulph (and yes that is my real name!) - allegedly posted by "Rhiannon Biddulph" (article subject132.185.144.122 )
  • Before you slander me further, I'll have you know that I have never visited the Pagan Association entry, and did not vandalise this article. I don't think either of you appear to be worth an article. That's why I put this article up for deletion. It would be great if we could all have our own article on Wikipedia... we'd end up with several billion pages. Not very practical though eh? --MacRusgail 16:06, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.