Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Walker (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 05:16, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Martin Walker

Martin Walker (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable individual, only publications are self published. What he esposes may be a notable fringe theory but he is not a notable proponent of it. I believe this went through an AfD some time ago with a no consensus result. Bigdaddy1981 04:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

As an additional point, I note that there are no verifiable references that confirm that Walker had anything to do with writing at least one of the publications listed - State of Siege (http://www.amazon.co.uk/State-Siege-Miners-Politics-Policing/dp/095099670X/ref=sr_1_14/202-2959890-8975820?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1186552677&sr=1-14)

• Delete Non-notable. No reliable sources.--Sethacus 04:59, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Non notable conspiracy loony. Nick mallory 06:06, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Not a reliable source. Daniel ⁵¹²⁷ 06:12, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Left-wing local politician (not stated in the article) and author of some self-published pamphlets. Of limited online notoriety. JFW | T@lk 16:01, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom & Sethacus. Article somehow survived first AfD, and eighteen months later it still doesn't assert notability or cite a single reliable source. Enough. Sideshow Bob Roberts 04:07, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Most notable allopathic critic writing in the UK today, hence the desire to delete his page.john

• John, if you think this guy is notable, just rewrite the article's introduction to establish how he meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Notability (people) and I'll withdraw my delete vote. Sideshow Bob Roberts 17:02, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.