Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Faulks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:50, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Martin Faulks

Subject is not sufficiently notable to justify an entire article. Appeared only after Vanity material was removed from Lewis Masonic

From Martin Faulks

I am just a man who sells books for a living. If you keep this article anyone could justify an entry.

• Delete nn person. Kcordina ^Talk 09:58, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Based on what I find, [1], the subject does not satisfy WP:BIO. Also, the article is unsourced. PJM 12:37, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, given that it was me that raised this in the firssst placeALR 14:39, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn. MSJapan 15:11, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 05:38, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Per nom. Nigelthefish 15:44, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep but rewriteThe article should stay. I thought the BBC programme was a landmark - it is about time someone blew the cobwebs from Masonry and stopped the ignorance that surrounds it. It is ignorance that breeds all the conspiracy theories and prejudice about Freemasons. Power to the young masons I say! The artice however is too boastful.
• Delete Moe ε 02:20, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.