Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Cannon (sculptor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 02:15, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Martin Cannon (sculptor)

Martin Cannon (sculptor) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Possible hoax -- zero references, no hits on anything. Original author has not come forward with any references, nor can I find any (despite this person's apparent notability). nneonneo ^talk 21:56, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

• G3 Seems to be a hoax. So tagged. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 22:02, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy declined (in caution) to "let this AfD run its course". nneonneo ^talk 16:25, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 02:12, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete No assertion of notability. Johnbod (talk) 02:31, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. As there are no reliable sources cited, I am persuaded that the article does not comply with the verifiability policy. In fact, likely hoax. Stifle (talk) 18:28, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as I too was unable to find anything. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 20:49, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per above...Modernist (talk) 00:49, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.