This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —Korath (Talk) 01:11, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
Converting from speedy candidate because my feeling is that this is a good-faith substub about a notable company (123,000 hits) . Kappa 16:12, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Keep is fine by me - David Gerard 20:26, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Seems a reasonable sub-stub, keep, expand. -- Jmabel | Talk 00:44, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.