The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Prominently stating that a thing is notable does not make it so. Whosasking 23:30, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom and WP:OR. It's a nice approach though, shows the editor realised it should be notable to merit an entry. Yomangani 23:58, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete per above. Nice try, though. --DarkAudit 17:26, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete per all above, good effort just the material isn't there for an article to exist. MLA 17:29, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.