Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marmayogi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Closing administrator is willing to userfy. JERRY talk contribs 03:35, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Marmayogi

Marmayogi (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Explicitly fails future film notability guidelines. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 21:25, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

  • KEEP: The film's been confirmed. Has millions of sources on the web. Highly expected. Most Expensive Indian film ever. Cast confimed. Crew confirmed. Shooting date announced. SHOULD STAY. There's no point having to create it all over again. If it had to be deleted, it had to be done nearly six months ago, when the film was only in discussion. Universal Hero (talk) 22:28, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Black Kite 02:18, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
  • KEEP Lots of ghits, probably no question of notability when complete, and "most expensive" claims make it notable as future film. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 03:38, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - The notability guidelines for future films stipulate that a stand-alone article for a film should not be created until a project enters production. This is because many factors such as budget issues, scripting issues, and casting issues can interfere with the project. The article can be recreated when principal photography is confirmed to have begun. Steve T • C 13:38, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete because the notability guidelines for future films are clear on this matter. Considering that this film has been a possibility since 2001, this hardly is a reason to disregard the guideline but instead actually follow it. Such films can linger in development hell with their articles being perpetual stubs. If the film begins production, which has been a possibility for the last seven years of the project's existence, the article can be revived. A heads-up to all -- just because a headline recently says that production may be imminent does not mean the headline will be right. Headlines dating back to 2001 had said the same thing, but nothing happened. There is no guarantee that the trend will all of a sudden be broken. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 13:51, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 13:53, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per Erik. Just as with Robot I am willing to userfy this article here so that someone who edits in this area can bring it back once the film begins production. The policy isn't arbitrary - look at the article, its filled with speculation. If someone boldly removed all the unverifiable comment you would have nothing but a stub. Leave this wild speculation to the tabloids until the film actually is being made, then we can have a proper article with facts instead of gossip about (just to pick an example) which prominent actresses have been approached to play the female leading role. Xymmax (talk) 14:40, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Erik, I've mentioned before. These are concrete films, the two biggest films ever in ASIA to date. There will be several thousand people who search for this. Universal Hero (talk) 17:50, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Until they start rolling, they are only hypothetically the biggest films. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 21:40, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Seems a shame to delete this, but it is in violation of guidelines so userfy and delete and recreate when shooting starts.--The Dominator (talk) 15:34, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  • KEEP: Confirmed project, and the entry will evolve as the news becomes more available. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Redindian (talk • contribs) 21:17, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.