Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Market Culture
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. W.marsh 16:35, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Market Culture
This may be a perfectly valid article. I'm unable to penetrate the ad-speak employed in the article. It originally had suggestions for a web search, which screamed to me of probable advertising placement from companies in the top of the Ghits. I'm just very, very suspicious of this article. I'm going to say this is for not meeting WP:Notability but I'm mostly wanting feedback about whether this could be a legit article or not. Pigman 01:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This is definitely not what one expects should be in this article, ie something about the culture of markets--Victor falk 05:12, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions. --Gavin Collins 22:36, 13 October 2007 (UTC)--
- Delete as non-notable neogolism at best, or worst case this is original research; can' say without secondary sources. --Gavin Collins 22:36, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, vehemently. People who write stuff like:
Conceptually, market culture involves all functions of an organization working seamlessly together to accurately determine customers’ current and future needs and to satisfy those needs. More concretely, it involves four types of behaviors: customer insight, competitor insight, cross-functional teaming, and collaborative networks. Buttressing and engendering these behaviors are specific cultural sets, skills sets, and organizational catalysts.
need to be aware that if they do so, someone will be laughing at them behind their back. - Smerdis of Tlön 15:07, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.