Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Wilberforce
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 00:01, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Mark Wilberforce
This is a nomination for Mark Wilberforce
He is a football player for Scarborough, in the Conference North, which is not a fully professional league. Therefore, the player fails our biography guidelines for sports-people, which requires playing in a fully professional league as a minimum, something this players has never done. --Chappy84 09:45, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. Chappy84 10:03, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:BIO. BlueValour 16:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - never played a professional game, fails WP:BIO. Qwghlm 18:55, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 20:24, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- Sorry, 1st one I'd done and only scanned instructions, didn't read fully, thanks for completing it.
- Delete - per above. Catchpole 22:47, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, no professional experience. Pre-season friendlies and reserve team fixtures don't count ChrisTheDude 07:22, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, WP:BIO makes the point about being in the squad for a "professional league" as a claim for notability extremely clear. Therefore, by virtue, those who don't reach this level are non-notable. Daniel.Bryant 10:10, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, no appearances for the Leeds first team. NawlinWiki 18:50, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, if he played for Leeds United it would be a keep but he didn't so delete. Kingjamie 20:49, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above WikiGull 19:26, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.