Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Scarborough

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:42, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mark Scarborough

Written by self, against Autobiography TOS. Furthermore, not written in a neutral standpoint. Bradcis 18:15, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:BIO and WP:VANITY. A shame that its original author, Owelles99 (talk • contribs • count) (whom I already told about this debate), hasn't returned to WP since last Christmas. --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 18:31, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as subject does not meet WP:BIO as well as the lack of WP:V sourcing.--Isotope23 19:45, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete The nominator does not have any valid point for deletion. WP:AUTO is NOT a criteria for deletion, merely for rewrite. The fact that an article is poorly written, not NPOV, or even autobiographical, does NOT make the subject non-notable. That all being said, this subject is non notable. relevent google search of "Mark Scarborough" Poet turns up 86 hits. Outside of a very limited geographic area, his works have not been reviewed by any reputable national press. Even a search of just "Mark Scarborough" turns up a smallish list of hits, mostly related to OTHER Mark Scarboroughs. Sorry, not notable. --Jayron32 06:16, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.