Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Patterson (Racing Analyst)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the relevant notability guideline. Davewild (talk) 18:44, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mark Patterson (Racing Analyst)

Mark Patterson (Racing Analyst) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

No assertion of Notability, no sources provided and none that I can find on google that would otherwise support this. Benea (talk) 05:57, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete non-notable. -Jahnx (talk) 08:30, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable. (Google search came up empty & article itself provides no information that seems to me to support notability.) TheScotch (talk) 09:47, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per failing WP:N ArcAngel (talk) 14:47, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep This individual IS notable. -- Ray-Ginsay (talk) 20:29, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

— Chaney L. Irving (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

  • Comment: The above account seems to have been created 3/21/8, which rather suggests to me that it may be a sock puppet. Is there a way to check this? TheScotch (talk) 04:43, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
It certainly seems possible. WP:NOREASON also applies in the case. This is not a vote and actual arguments must be presented or it may be dismissed. Benea (talk) 05:26, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment: There are currently five contributions attributed to this editor. Three are clearly vandalism: same article (H), same day, same edit. Another is a brief introductory sentence at the editor's user page, and the fifth is this endorsement. I'd like someone to trace the address. TheScotch (talk) 05:24, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.