Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Moore

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete --cesarb 29 June 2005 22:20 (UTC)

[edit] Mark Moore

Seems like a vanity article, as there is no noteable infromation in it —Kjammer 07:13, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete vanity. JamesBurns 08:05, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Congratulations on the job! Delete, vanity. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:24, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Comment Not sure: new Headmaster of a very famous Public School, currently senior teacher at another one. Not sure on this one. (It should also be pointed out that we have other articles on Headmasters of Public Schools.) James F. (talk) 10:51, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per Ecclesiastes 1:2. — mark ✎ 10:52, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • ... and what does that say? Always nice to know what others are saying. James F. (talk) 10:59, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Vanity of vanities, saith the Preacher, vanity of vanities; all is vanity. And yes, delete. --W(t) 13:32, 2005 Jun 16 (UTC)
    • As a corollary to that, I'm still waiting for the all hell that was supposed to break loose when we kept Genesis 1:1 (or Genesis 1:2 or any other verse that's been on VfD recently). -- Jonel | Speak 02:36, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • heh... delete! UkPaolo 18:12, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep headmasters if we're going to keep schools. RickK 04:31, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn  Grue  18:19, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Important man for an important school.

  unsigned vote by User:Williamhansonhmgn - his 7th edit)  Grue  07:43, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Keep WHy should the current head have a page and not the new one - he will be there in a few months.

  unsigned vote by User:62.231.155.4 - his 5th edit  Grue  07:43, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Keep - needs some work for sure - but this is a major public school and the chap obviously has something about him. A curate's egg 14:29, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, nn. --W(t) 14:30, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC) [Second vote see above - 16 June]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.