Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Janse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Rje 16:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mark Janse

Possibly a vanity article. Looks more like a user page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mostly Rainy (talk • contribs) 06:30, 22 May 2006 (UTC).

• Comment Was it really necessary to bring it to AfD one minute after it was created? I feel uncomfortable voicing any opinion on the matter until the article has time to mature, as it certainly doesn't seem to be a candidate for speedy deletion with 700 hits on Google. AmiDaniel (talk) 06:30, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

The thing is a lot of people try to make a bio article and the ones lacking sufficiant details (like the one I nominated) often get speedy deleted. Mostly Rainy 06:32, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

• Comment alright I'll add some more details and then others can add their share and opinions so it will mature Franciosb
• Keep as the article stands. Good work Franciosb. THE KING 07:52, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep needs expansion to ensure he meets the wiki-prof test. Arbusto 09:04, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep the discovery of Cappadoacian Greek seems adequate. Dlyons493 Talk 11:58, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. The rediscovery of a major Greek dialect is significant, and he is full professor at what appears to be a part of Utrecht University, which is an important seat of learning. up+land 12:07, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Lot of professors in this world... Medico80 15:38, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. The rediscovery of the Cappadocian dialect seems to make him notable enough for inclusion. If there's going to be more information added to this page (which I hope), I'd like to see more explanation of this event, and links to media coverage. In any case, currently satisfies at least one point in WP:PROF. Docether 17:54, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above comments. Amazinglarry 23:22, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. --mtz206 (talk) 02:03, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.