Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Gottlieb (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The only sources provided here are articles by the subject, which does not establish notability. Being "known" among a gaming community does not either, especially when it is mentioned as speculation rather than a verifiable fact. Tijuana Brass 00:15, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Mark Gottlieb
AfDs for this article:
non-notable individual Arthur 21:56, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Games has been notified of this discussion. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:45, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I skimmed the previous AFD (link in box at right), so I understand why people think he's notable, but reliable sources are missing. I can see that he wrote some articles, but who can demonstrate that articles have been written about him, which is a standard notability criterion? Shalom (Hello • Peace) 02:16, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete unless reliable external sources are provided. I think the article rather gives away the non-notability with "Within the community of enthusiasts of the game, he is a well-known...". Phil Bridger 14:54, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- Biased Keep - I think we should keep it, but I'm only saying that because I wrote a lot of the article. Cooljeanius (talk) (contribs) 18:48, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Delete - I know of the guy, but I don't really think he's notable outside of Magic: the Gathering. Having said that, neither is Mark Rosewater, Matt Cavotta, Randy Buehler, or the whole of Category:Magic: The Gathering players (yes, I know, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS). Perhaps merging them all into a List of Wizards of the Coast employees would be the best way of handling this situation? Terraxos 18:29, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- On second thoughts, Magicthegathering.com would be the best place to merge all those articles, since it mentions most of them already. Terraxos 18:31, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I can't see that notability has been established, but kudos to Cooljeanius for honesty! Eixo 18:31, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.