Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Derrick

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 00:50, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mark Derrick

Mark Derrick (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable railroad hobbyist. I tagged it for improvement, but nothing has been done for months. Clarityfiend 04:43, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete A google search shows up no reliable hits for this subject. Moreover, it is impossible to verify the contents of this subject as well. --Siva1979Talk to me 04:50, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
  • DELETE! - Looks more like a user page than a encyclopedia entry! -69.132.197.146 03:50, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Caknuck 03:48, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Does not meet WP:BIO. Agree that reads like a user page. Brusegadi 04:59, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Does not meet WP:N. And, although it has some useful information on purchasing his games should anyone be interested, the ad may be better suited for Wikiforsaleia rather than for Wikipedia. -- Jreferee (Talk) 06:03, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete simply not notable Recurring dreams 09:11, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep since I know that I would consider a wargame designer with his credits to be notable. Weak because no claim has been made that his variations on the 18xx system have been particularly innovative, and I don't have any experience with the rail game genre to be sure who is notable within it. --Groggy Dice T | C 12:16, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.