Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Blackwall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--JForget 23:42, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mark Blackwall

Mark Blackwall (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable individual. Fails WP:N. Completely unverifiable due to lack of references, no non-wikipedia hits in Google, Google scholar or Google books. Probably should be speedy-delete, but I wasn't sure. BelovedFreak 13:54, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as lacking reliable sources establishing notability. Sounds like an angsty teen who is trying to self-promote. /Blaxthos 15:31, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. —David Eppstein 15:33, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Blaxthos. Freshacconci | Talk 16:20, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above.--Ethicoaestheticist 17:17, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -RiverHockey 17:28, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. - Snigbrook 01:25, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above. - Modernist 13:00, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.--TGreenburgPR 02:35, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.