Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Bennett Jr.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete, joke page, nn-bio Madchester 02:01, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mark Bennett Jr.

Normally I'd tag this speedy, but something gets me about the death date in the future, and figured I'd AFD it instead. Andy Saunders 00:46, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

• Note to closing admin: Consider also deleting [[Image:HeroMark.jpg]] which was uploaded by the original author of the article and is ONLY used by this article. Zunaid 12:48, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Only relevant page about him that comes up on Google is his mini-biography on the website of his college sports team, and even that doesn't say anything of much interest. The picture in the article should probably be deleted, too. Hbackman 00:49, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

• delete as non-notable (unless a claim to notability is added). He does exist, though: [1] --Austrian 00:51, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as vanity page

• Delete as above. --Bugturd 01:02, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Bizarre. Hopefully this isn't a cryptic suicide note.--ragesoss 02:17, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This is a very well-written (and very strange) mostly fictional article. I have no idea why it was created or edited by a few different people. Anyway, it's a nn-bio. Grandmasterka 05:04, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. Ok, I realize this goes against the policy here for articles, but for comic relief, it's original at least! Kmac1036 06:26, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. You make a good point about the future death date. Royboycrashfan 07:20, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete though it's a decent joke. Author should have saved this for April Fools'. Draeco 10:07, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not good enough for BJAODN. Zunaid 12:48, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. And there is worse stuff on BJAODN. -Jcbarr 14:17, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Not worth BJAODN ComputerJoe 19:50, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Don't Delete. This is a really well written article and obviously a joke.

• Delete per nom. Latinus 23:00, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.