Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark (Pern)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Pern. There is not currently sufficient reliable sourcing for the article on Mark to exist independently. Xoloz (talk) 15:04, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mark (Pern)

Mark (Pern) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete - no reliable sources attest to the notability of this particular aspect of the Pern series. Prod disputed by editor noting the existence of other fictional currency articles but the existence of other articles does not serve to justify this article. Otto4711 03:27, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete: I don't belive this meets notability requirements. If it is important to the book(s), then merge to the appropriate article. - Rjd0060 04:19, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Pern, as far is as relevant to the article without undue weight about its currency.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 06:32, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep or possibly merge as a new section in the main Pern article. I see no reason to delete it. What makes that any less worthy than other Pern articles? Marks are frequently mentioned in the books. Nik42 07:24, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete No secondary sources to establish notability or provide real world context. -- Jay32183 (talk) 20:49, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.