Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark's markets

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete all as nonsense. The bits about "2005 gummy worm squeeze" and "binary identification pneumatic" did it for me. Kimchi.sg 19:47, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mark's markets

Also nominating:

• Mark’s Markets (copy, alternate ' character)
• Mark Patek

Blog that does not appear to be widely noted[1][2]. Articles slip into semi-nonsense ("playboy savant", "Gummy Worm squeeze", "ultimate metaphor for...genius and power", financial world adopted his "masterfully engineered linguistical system", ...). Weregerbil 15:08, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per failing WP:CORP, WP:V, WP:SPAM, WP:WEB, WP:NOT and I suspect WP:HOAX WilyD 16:57, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

• I almost failed to realise Mark Patek fails WP:BIO. My bad. WilyD 17:02, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete all three as nonsense, patent nonsense. --DarkAudit 18:39, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.