Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marion Braidfute

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus default to keep. You don't have to start an AFD if you just want to merge an article into another one. - ulayiti (talk) 12:20, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Marion Braidfute

She is an unhistorical character, there is not enough to say about her to justify her own article rather than mentioning her in either William Wallace or Blind Harry PatGallacher 10:50, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

• Merge per nominator. Logophile 13:56, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge as above. Maccoinnich 14:38, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - well known (quasi-)historical figure. --MacRusgail 20:20, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per Logophile. Stifle 02:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. How many of those pestilential Pokemon creatures will anybody remember in 700 years? Monicasdude 03:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Being un-historical, quasi-historical, mythical or fictional is not the same thing as being non-notable. There are tons of Wikipedia articles about legendary figures: Braidfute is more likely to be based on a real woman than many others. Wikipedia is not paper.--Mais oui! 20:33, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.