Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mario releated things

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:29, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mario releated things

Need I even provide a reason? Unencyclopaedic fancruft. Spelled wrong. --Rory096 08:24, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as an indiscriminate collection of fancruft. --Hyperbole 08:36, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as fancruft --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 08:42, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Ezeu 08:45, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 09:19, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Listcruft, fancruft, unencyclopædic.  (aeropagitica)  10:05, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Someone has mistaken Wikipedia for GameFAQs forums. JIP | Talk 11:48, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Per nom. Kilo-Lima|^(talk) 12:03, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - I'm not sure this qualifies as fancruft. That implies that fans find it interesting or important. Pagrashtak 13:52, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Useless, not important. M2K 16:21, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Look at his talk page & "contributions". Wikipedia is not a gaming forum. Lord Falcon 20:10, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete worthless article. not needed. Newyorktimescrossword 20:34, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete pointless list, put the info back in the main article if it's at all important. ProhibitOnions 22:59, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Pagrashtak. Good one ;-) --Icarus 08:28, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.