Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marilyn Barrueta

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:42, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Marilyn Barrueta

Marilyn Barrueta (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Fails WP:BIO as lacking sources and failing to assert notability beyond Teachers Hall of Fame. David Fuchs (talk) 16:02, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:11, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep National Teachers hall of fame is exactly the sort of thing which makes for significance, in this or any other topic. it's a major national award, and she is on their website. [1] DGG (talk) 19:59, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
    • The National Teachers Hall of Fame is itself of dubious notability. Why does a resume-like profile of this woman on its unreliable website confer signficance? Would you be notable if I founded an organization called the Global Wikipedians Hall of Fame and profiled you on my website? Oh, and on what do you base your claim that it's a "major national award"? 152.3.247.43 (talk) 20:39, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
      • Nope, I'd count it as a major worldwide one! ;) matt91486 (talk) 04:47, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
        • Comment Get your postulated one the kind of support that it has gotten [2], [3], and you might have a case for it. This one does seem to be the major national award in its field. DGG (talk) 06:19, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep -- there are only a few ways that a secondary or primary school teacher can obtain national notability, but one of them is a selective National Hall of Fame with significant people (former governors, etc.) on the board of trustees. DGG's logic is sound here. -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 19:32, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.