Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marie St. Fleur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn --Arnzy (talk • contribs) 00:52, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Marie St. Fleur

Non-notable person; no evidence of satisfying WP:BIO. Valrith 20:02, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

• Withdrawn. As noted by Dina, article now shows notability, so I withdraw my nomination. Valrith 22:40, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - An unencyclopedic article on a nn. Victoriagirl 20:15, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Keep - As a state representative, she carries a certain degree of notability... even without the scandal. Good catch Dina. Victoriagirl 22:27, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

• Keep This article needs tons of work, but honestly, she's been really big news here in Massachusetts. She's the first Haitian immigrant elected to public office in the state, she got asked to run for Lt. gov and then it all fell apart due to scandal. The person is notable, the article does not assert it. Let me work on it a bit. Dina 20:25, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Comment I worked on the article, at least to the extent that I believe it now asserts a respectable amount of notability. I will continue to work on it, as I was researching her I realized there's more to write. Dina 22:13, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom Hello32020 22:14, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Comment I just wanted to note here that the nom is not actually correct (that is the original article's fault, as it was one sentence long.) The article does satisfy WP:BIO, specifically "Political figures holding international, national or statewide/provincewide office or members of a national, state or provincial legislature." Marie St. Fleur is a Massachusetts State Representative. Now that the claim to notability is asserted by the article itself, I think we should rethink this Afd Dina 22:31, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.