Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marianne Faulkner

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 08:38, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Marianne Faulkner

Vanity. Kelly Martin 12:36, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete: Towering vanity, blog promotion, page rank boosting. I nowiki'd the links. Geogre 13:07, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• This article is incredibly badly written. In amongst phrases such as "awesomeness" and "of the Mexican persuasion", the only facts in this article are the date of birth (She's 18 years old today.), the professions of this person's parents, the existence of a sister, the existence of a web log, and this person's attendance of fashion school. All of the rest is exactly the sort of "unrealized aspirations, thoughts, and hobbies" content that Wikipedia:vanity discusses. And then there's the fact that this page reeks of autobiography, despite being written in the 3rd person. WP:BIO criteria not met with a vengance. Delete. Uncle G 13:39, 2005 Jun 15 (UTC)
• Delete as vanity page. Note that there was another Marianne Faulkner who donated some funds for the construction of Dartmouth Medical School, but I don't think she did anything more notable than that. Sarg 14:24, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Any article that refers to its subject being a "camwhore", going to something called "fashion school" and being famous for her "awesomeness" needs fixing, but this person doesn't seem to amount to anything anyway. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 14:27, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Textbook vanity. In her LiveJournal [1] she says that she told a friend that she wanted to be in Wikipedia, and so he created this article. I hope she enjoys her five days of "fame". . . . . Soundguy99 15:52, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Strong delete. UGH. This is exactly what we do not need in Wikipedia. Does this girl understand exactly how easy it is to get into the encyclopaedia, and exactly how easy it is to be deleted? *Just another Gwen Stefani - a Western girl who fetishises and wants to be Japanese. Utter trash. jglc | t | c 16:54, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete asap. DS1953 19:18, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete in the most fashionable way possible. Oh, and happy birthday. --FCYTravis 19:36, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Our little girl is turning eighteen!! jglc | t | c 20:40, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete rampant vanity. --Etacar11 22:40, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep You ppl suck jus' cuz u donna hav guts offf makin' a page doesnt mean others shoulda be erased.--64.229.92.23 01:28, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Within 14 minutes, this anon managed to contribute eight times to various VfD votes, each time voting to keep an obvious joke entry. jglc | t | c 01:35, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Leave the vanity for the User pages. Firien 11:12, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.