Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marianne Benko

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Tyrenius (talk) 05:48, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Marianne Benko

Marianne Benko (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

If this person is notable enough for Wikipedia, it does not become clear from the article. Aecis^Brievenbus 17:10, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletions, the list of Netherlands-related deletions and the list of arts-related deletions. Aecis^Brievenbus 17:24, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable. freshacconcispeaktome 17:32, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:37, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. 4 edit, 1 subject creator. I see she "exposes all over Europe" - I must keep an eye out. Johnbod (talk) 17:46, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Does not pass notability muster. • Lawrence Cohen 18:35, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.   jj137 (Talk) 19:27, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Notability not established. JNW (talk) 03:49, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete 53 Google hits in Hungarian, of which 2 refer to an exhibition of her works. That shows she's nowhere near notable, at least for now. KissL 10:43, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

• Comment. What search did you do? This search gives 121 unique hits, mostly in Dutch. She has lived and worked in the Netherlands since 1984, so you wouldn't expect much about her in Hungarian. I don't read Dutch very well, but these links do seem to indicate that her work has been widely exhibited. Maybe a Dutch speaker could check out those links. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:16, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

• All seem to be small galleries and web directories etc. The fact a small work in acrylic on paper is priced at €295 doesn't suggest deleters are wrong. Johnbod (talk) 12:41, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
• My search was this - making use of the fact that Hungarian has the eastern name order. It is indeed possible that she is notable in the Netherlands; if someone provides a proof, I am willing to change my recommendation. KissL 18:15, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

• I've gone through the first four or five pages of Google hits, and I could only find minor, non-notable galleries, no notable museums and no non-passing coverage in reliable sources. Aecis^Brievenbus 20:20, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Modernist (talk) 14:39, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. A fine artist, but she, like many living artists, is just not notable. Bearian'sBooties (talk) 00:33, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.