Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marguerite Perrin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Nishkid64 04:18, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Marguerite Perrin

Marguerite Perrin (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Non-notable participant on a reality television show. Mikeblas 04:28, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Keep - probably one of the more well known contestants on American Reality Television. I come up with nearly a million ghits and a handful of news ghits. The article could, and should, probably stay - though relistically it could be trimmed back a bit. -- wtfunkymonkey 05:28, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, she got widespread attention from shows beyond her original appearance. Nontrivial coverage in secondary sources = notability. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 06:57, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep plenty of outside sources to confirm her notability. JuJube 07:23, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, notability established, reliable independent sources to assert her notability. Terence Ong 12:16, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep sadly she meets the notability criteria --Kevin Murray 18:04, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep she certainly is on TV enough, and even though she is a little out there, she is notable since there are sources on her. Darthgriz⁹⁸ 18:16, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per above. ← ANAS ^Talk? 20:30, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per non-trivial coverage.--Jersey Devil 20:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per above. As much as I hate that this person could possibly be notable, she is notable. Letoofdune 02:59, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Keep Reality TV is a huge part of today's entertainment landscape and Marguerite Perrin is at the forefront of those who are most widely (no pun intended) recognized in this category. SpearsLover 08:21, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Keep. Her meltdown was notable enough, and the number of views and parodies (via YouTube and such) she has circulating ought to indicate just how much. And as for her so-called "fame" as a reality TV star, I don't recall any Real World alumni or even a Survivor winner getting this much publicity over a five-minute scream-fest...at least not enough to warrant an appearance on Leno and dolls and t-shirts made in their honor. Tipsy Firecracker 08:30, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - Recognizable cultural phenomenon people talk about. It's more than notable.
• Strong Keep - Certainly notable inasmuch as people are looking her up. I don't see any reason for deletion. Dkorn 18:47, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - She'll be back in the spotlight soon enough. Longshot1980 01:50, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - Let the fat cow have her infamy posted on Wikipedia. --293.xx.xxx.xx 05:49, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - Had widespread public interest, and will soon be making another appearance. -128.208.47.97 05:52, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - What do you mean she is no-notable, she is the most well known character from Trading Spouses. This article is an article of interest, although as it stands now it could use some expanding. She will be appearing on that show again, no one else has done that. If Star wars kid warrents a Wikipedia page than she does also. —The preceding User:BenW comment was added by 204.62.200.20 (talk) 00:51, 19 January 2007 (UTC).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.