Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marge Rull

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to M/S Estonia, which wouldn't have needed an AfD. Mergers can, as an editorial decision, be done from the history. Sandstein 05:50, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Marge Rull

Marge Rull (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Claim to fame is surviving the M/S Estonia disaster and being interviewed in subsequent media coverage. Clearly not the "primary focus" of such media coverage, fails WP:BIO. Suggest redir to M/S Estonia. Deizio talk 14:18, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

• Redirect per nom and respectfully. This was a horrible disaster but that does not mean that we should list every survivor. MartinDK 16:13, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect. Agreed; each of the 137 survivors isn't automatically notable for that fact alone, and her media coverage is hardly in line with WP:BIO's criteria. Geoffrey Spear 20:10, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect - I agree with the above statements, so I suggest merging whatever's possible with the main article, and then redirecting. Jayden54 21:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with M/S Estonia...SkierRMH,08:11, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per nom. Else there should be entries for every Katrina survivor, Holocaust survivor, etc. There will and should be memorials, but WIkipedia is an online encyclopedia, not a online tribute site.TruthGal 02:07, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.