Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Da Cunha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge into Capitalism Magazine. - ulayiti (talk) 12:07, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Marc Da Cunha

600+ Google But notice almost every page is a Wikipedia mirror. Unverifiable, maybe vanity. delete

• Delete Nothing beyond the mention on the magazine wiki article, maybe vanity. --BACbKA 00:29, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Lotsofissues 00:27, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

• Comment. Since the 23rd of September, 2004, Da Cunha has been listed as upkeeping Capitalism magazine. His name does not appear on the website [www.capmag.com], but one and a quarter years is a long time between two supposed pieces of vanity. I think that Cunha is the editor, although there is no evidence to prove that he is or that he is not. My inkling is that it was written by someone filling in the url gap on the capmag article. However, this article, in its current state, does not show much evidence of notability, despite the magazine's being notable. I would say delete, unless someone can pull something out of the hat showing that da Cunha is more than some editor, or at least, facts about the guy's life and thought. --It's-is-not-a-genitive 00:42, 8 January 2006 (UTC)]]
• Slow delete. We don't want to fall victim to systemic bias but until something verifiable shows up we have little choice but to delete. Let it linger for a while before closing just in case. - Haukur 01:03, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

• Okay, Merge&Redirect sounds like a plan. - Haukur 19:01, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

• Merge what little there is into Capitalism Magazine. --zenohockey 06:42, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment If Wikipedia adopted a Limbo namespace, this article could be moved to Limbo during the discussion on deletion. Moving an article to Limbo would remove it from the article namespace and prevent search engines from delivering suspicious content while the community decides whether to keep or delete it. For more information, see the discussion on establishing the Limbo namespace. Fg2 10:18, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge/redirect Capitalism Magazine CDC (talk) 18:45, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete not notable. --Revolución (talk) 03:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete --Terence Ong ^Talk 11:32, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. -- Nikodemos (f.k.a. Mihnea) 20:37, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.